ISSN-0303-5212
  The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Rawalpindi - Islamabad
 
     
Volume 34, Number 2, July - Dec. 2009
     
 
Academia and Clinic
 
Effectiveness of various teaching strategies for promoting
breast feeding
 
Iffat F. Zaman, Khawaja A. Abbas, Gulshan Saeed
 
Objective

To use different teaching tools and study their effectiveness by assessing changes in knowledge, attitude and management skills of fourth year medical students about breast feeding.

Method

A six hour course, spread over three days was designed using Guidelines from Breastfeeding Counseling; A Training Course, WHO/CDR 93.3 and UNICEF/NUT 93.1.. Lectures and large group interactive sessions, small group discussions and role playing were used to teach different components of the course. Participants were evaluated by pre and post test of the same set of multiple choice questions. Six questions dealt with contents taught in the form of lectures, four covered small group contents and another four questions evaluated the contents taught in role playing.

Results

Out of a total of 80 students, 68 completed the course. Mean score before the course was 7.86±2.37 which increased to 11.37±1.26 after the course. Percentage change in Pre and post test scores for lectures, small group sessions and role playing were 18.34%, 25.5% and 35.75% respectively.

Conclusions

All teaching strategies were found to be effective in increasing knowledge, changing attitude and providing management skills necessary for promoting breast feeding. Maximum gain was seen with the role playing. (Rawal Med J 2009;34: 226-228).
 
Key Words: Breast Feeding, medical education, small groups.
 
INTRODUCTION
 
Breast feeding not only protects the infant against a wide range of infectious diseases1 ranging from diarrhea2 to bacteremia and meningitis3 but it also decreases incidence of many problems later in life.4,5 However, enough emphasis is not placed on the importance of breast feeding in medical text books6,7 and most health professionals feel inadequate in this area.8 The majority of pediatricians are unfamiliar with the contents of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, they have not attended a presentation on breastfeeding management and most say they want more education on breastfeeding management.9 This lack of confidence and level of competence may be the biggest barrier to breast feeding promotion.10 There is, therefore, a significant educational need in the area of breastfeeding.11 A course was designed in an attempt to bridge this gap keeping in mind the time constraints on medical students. Educational research has shown that students actively involved in learning will learn more than those who are passive recipients.12 Active involvement increases students' level of understanding and enables them to integrate and synthesize the material13 and therefore, active participation by the student was a major theme of the workshop. The goal of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of interactive lectures, small group discussions and role playing as teaching tools by assessing changes in knowledge, attitude and management skills, of fourth year medical students about breast feeding.
 
PATIENTS AND METHODS
 
We designed a six hour course to be delivered over three days to fourth year medical students using guidelines from Breastfeeding Counseling: A Training Course, designed by WHO/CDR/93.3-6, and UNICEF/NUT/93.1. The actual material (40 hours) was abridged and actual patient visits were deleted due to time constraints. Role playing was introduced to increase students' interest and involvement. The trainers were also selected in accordance with the recommendations. All the trainers (three obstetricians and three pediatricians) were working as consultants and teachers in a “baby friendly hospital” and were actively involved in promoting breastfeeding. They had prior experience in breastfeeding promotion and had conducted similar courses for nurses and pediatric residents (but not for medical students) multiple times.

Workshops were conducted for two hours daily for three days. First day lectures and large group interactive sessions were used to teach breast anatomy, milk production let down reflex and composition of breast milk. Multimedia, overhead projector and white board were used. The sessions of the second day were small group discussions on advantages of breast feeding, its role in decreasing morbidity and mortality in children and problems associated with bottle feeding. Each group consisted of 10-12 students and one facilitator. Buzz groups were encouraged and a scribe was chosen by the students from among themselves. Flipcharts and white boards were used for the sessions. Last day sessions were role plays on trouble shooting of various actual and perceived problems associated with breast feeding. Students were divided into 5 small groups and each group was given four different scenarios, one each about cracked nipple, concept of “bad milk” (fairly common in Pakistan), excessive cry (perceived decreased milk production) and weaning. Mothers (students) came with problems to the doctor (facilitator). Students took history and tried to solve the problem. Facilitator then took detailed history and explained to the “mother”. (No actual examination was done and things were explained with the help of diagrams) while other students listened and case was discussed among the group. Students were encouraged to bring forth any other problem they had heard of.

Students were evaluated by pre and post test of the same set of multiple choice questions. There were a total of 14 multiple choice questions with 5 stems and one correct answer. Six questions dealt with contents taught in the form of lectures, four covered small group contents and another four questions evaluated the contents taught in role playing. Questions were graded; average correct answer for each question and mean value of correct answers and standard deviations for pre and post test questionnaire was calculated by “Optical Mark Reader, Version 2.0”.
 
RESULTS
 
Out of a total of 80 students 68 students completed the course. Pre-test questionnaire was administered to 59 students, while all 68 students who completed the course took the post-test questionnaire. Mean score before the course was 7.86±2.73, which increased to 11.37±1.26 after the course.
 
Table 1. Pre and Post Training Scores.
 
Table 1 gives the percentage correctly answered in the three groups.
 
Table 2. Distribution of Pre and Post Test Scores
 
Aggregate performance for all three groups together is presented in Table 2, which lists the number of students achieving the scores in the indicated percentage range. 30% students had a 50% or less score in the pre training quiz. Nearly all students scored more than 50% in the post training quiz.
 
DISCUSSION
 
The basic theme for our teaching methodology was active learning which refers to techniques where students do more than simply listen to a lecture. Less emphasis is placed on transmitting information and more on developing students' skills. Students are involved in higher-order thinking (analysis, synthesis, evaluation), and greater emphasis is placed on students' exploration of their own attitudes and values. It is an umbrella term that refers to several models of instruction that focus the responsibility of learning on learners.14 Interactive lectures provided them with an opportunity to reinforce and revise their learning and increase self confidence. This methodology gave a 17% improvement in the test scores. Small group discussions are known to have a greater level of student participation.15 They are shown to promote deeper understanding of material, encourage problem solving and develop interpersonal skills16 and we obtained similar results.

Our students showed a 25 % increase in post test. Level of involvement in role playing was much higher than in any other method of learning. It is, therefore, not surprising that role playing gave us the best results (37% increase). Other researchers have come to a similar conclusion about role playing in a different teaching setting.17 It was initially difficult to encourage students to participate in the role playing sessions. They felt embarrassed in discussion of breastfeeding as it was a mixed class and gender; segregation is still a norm in many subcultures in Pakistan. With a little encouragement and relaxed environment, students became enthusiastic and participated well.
 
CONCLUSION
 
All teaching strategies were found to be effective in increasing knowledge, changing attitude and providing management skills necessary for promoting breast feeding with role playing giving the best results.
 
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
 
We thank Dr. KS Raja, Dr. Nabia Tariq and Dr. Ejaz Khan, who helped the authors in delivering the workshops and conducting various sessions. We also thank the administration and support staff of Shifa College of Medicine who made this workshop possible.
 
From Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Correspondance: Dr. Iffat F. Zaman, House # 5A, Street #33, F8/1, Islamabad, Pakistan. Email, iffatfzaman@yahoo.com.
Tel: 0519260027, Mobile #: 03445211235
Received: June 18, 2009 Accepted: September 29, 2009
 
REFERENCES
 
  1. Heinig MJ. Host defense benefits of breastfeeding for the infant. Effect of breastfeeding duration and exclusivity. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001;48:105-23.
  2. Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr 1995;126:696-02.
  3. Cochi SL, Fleming DW, Hightower AW, Limpakarnjanart K, Facklam RR, Smith JD, et al. Primary invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease: a population-based assessment of risk factors. J Pediatr 1986;108:887-96.
  4. Oddy WH, Holt PG, Sly PD, Read AW, Landau LI, Stanley FJ, et al. Association between breast feeding and asthma in 6 year old children: findings of a prospective birth cohort study. BMJ1999;319:815-19.
  5. Chulada PC, Arbes SJ Jr, Dunson D, Zeldin DC. Breast-feeding and the prevalence of asthma and wheeze in children: analyses from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 19881994. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:328-36.
  6. Phillip BL, Merewood A , Gerandas EA, Butchner H. Breast feeding information in pediatrics textbooks needs improvement. J Hum Lact 2004;20:206-10.
  7. Phillip BL, McMahon MJ, Davies S, Santos T, Marie J. Breast feeding information in nursing textbook needs improvement. J Hum Lact 2007; 23:345-49.
  8. Freed GL, Clark SJ, Sorenson J, Lohr JA, Cefals R, Curtis P. National assessment of physicians breast feeding knowledge, attitudes, training and experience. JAMA 1995;273:472-76.
  9. Schanler RJ, O'Conner KG, Ruth AL. Pediatricians' practice and attitudes regarding breast feeding promotion. Pediatrics 1999;103:E35.
  10. Coreil J, Bryant CA, Westover BJ, Bailey D, Health professionals and breast feeding counseling: Clients and professionals views. J Hum Lact 1995;11:265-71.
  11. Dhandapany G, Bethou A, Arunagirinathan A, Ananthakrishnan S. Antenatal Counseling on Breast Feeding. Is It Adequate? A Descriptive Study From Pondicherry, India. Internat Breastfeeding J 2008;3:3-5.
  12. Butler JA. Use of teaching methods within the lecture format. Med Teach 1992; 14:11-25.
  13. Nasmith L. Steinert Y. The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive learning. Teach Learn Med 2001;13:3-48.
  14. Bonwell A, Eison J. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
  15. Crosby J. Learning in small groups. Med Teach 1996;18:189-02.
  16. Dent A, Harden RM (eds.). A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. 2005 Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, 2nd edition
  17. Nikendei C, Zeuch A, Dieckmann P, Roth C, Chafer S, Volkl M, Schellberg D, et al. Role Playing for More Realistic Technical Skills Training. Med Teach, 2005; 27:122-26.
 
All right reserved Rawal Medical Journal 2004 - 2008