ISSN 0303-5212
 

Original Research 


Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts

Hawraz Sardar Abdulkareem, Fahd Sudad Ikram.


Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of static loading on stress distribution in different abutment heights, diameters, and angulations of stock and customized abutments using finite element analysis (FEA).
Methodology: This computational experimental study used three-dimensional finite element simulations from Jun to August 2025. Two implant groups of equal height were modeled: Group 1 (narrow diameter, 3.5 mm) and Group 2 (regular diameter, 5.0 mm). Sixteen abutments with varying height, diameter, and angulation (stock and customized) were included. Inclusion criteria were commercially available implant–abutment assemblies compatible with the selected implant systems. Exclusion criteria were abutments incompatible with the modeled connection design or with incomplete geometric data. A static load of axial and 30° oblique force was applied. Parametric values (stresses and deformation) were determined using ANSYS 2024 R1 based on the maximum equivalent von Mises stress (MPa) recorded at the implant fixture, abutment, and abutment screw.
Results: Stress varied by abutment design and implant diameter. Standard abutments showed the highest fixture stress (739 MPa in 3.5-mm implants), while customized abutments reduced stress by ~25–30%. 25° angled abutments increased stress by up to 41% versus 15°. Deformation did not differ significantly (p>0.05), but fixture and screw stresses were abutment-dependent (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The highest stresses occurred at the implant–abutment connection. Taller abutments increased bending moments and stress under oblique loading, while narrower components amplified stress concentration. Wider and customized abutments distributed stress more favorably, reducing the risk of mechanical failure.

Key words: Abutment heights, dental implant part, Von-mises, static load, stress pattern.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Hawraz Sardar Abdulkareem
Articles by Fahd Sudad Ikram
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Abdulkareem HS, Ikram FS. Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. RMJ. 2026; 51(2): 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551


Web Style

Abdulkareem HS, Ikram FS. Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=301011 [Access: May 27, 2026]. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Abdulkareem HS, Ikram FS. Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. RMJ. 2026; 51(2): 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Abdulkareem HS, Ikram FS. Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. RMJ. (2026), [cited May 27, 2026]; 51(2): 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551



Harvard Style

Abdulkareem, H. S. & Ikram, . F. S. (2026) Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. RMJ, 51 (2), 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551



Turabian Style

Abdulkareem, Hawraz Sardar, and Fahd Sudad Ikram. 2026. Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. Rawal Medical Journal, 51 (2), 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551



Chicago Style

Abdulkareem, Hawraz Sardar, and Fahd Sudad Ikram. "Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts." Rawal Medical Journal 51 (2026), 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Abdulkareem, Hawraz Sardar, and Fahd Sudad Ikram. "Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts." Rawal Medical Journal 51.2 (2026), 507-512. Print. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Abdulkareem, H. S. & Ikram, . F. S. (2026) Influence of axial and 30-degree angled static loads on dental implant parts. Rawal Medical Journal, 51 (2), 507-512. doi:10.5455/rmj.20251202042551