ISSN 0303-5212
 

Original Research 
RMJ. 2026; 51(3): 810-813


Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion

Iram Iqbal Shamsi, Basit Ansari, Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, Sadaf Subhi, Noman Arshad Lari.


Abstract
Objective: To assess the interrater reliability of the modified Schober test for measuring lumbar flexion by evaluating the level of agreement among examiners who administer the test in a standardized setting.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Sind Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation from 1st January 2024 to 20th February 2024 using non-probability purposive sampling. Overall, 30 participants (15 male and 15 female) were assessed by two independent assessors by modified Schober tests for lumbar flexion; two successive measurements were taken. Participants aged between 18 and 40 years having subacute pain (pain for >1.5 months) were recruited from both genders. Those who had any history related to spinal surgery, previous administration of epidural injections, LBP due to specific pathology, neurological deficits (like stroke) and clinical disorders contraindicated to exercise were excluded. Two MABIS Retractable Tape Measures 1-cm increments were used to acquire measurements with the Modified Schober technique. Lumbar measurements were taken by both the rapists on two occasions, 3 days apart.
Results: The reliability analysis demonstrated high inter-rater agreement. Cronbach’s alpha for all measurement items was 0.989, indicating excellent internal consistency.
Conclusion: The modified Schober test demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability and strong agreement between assessors.

Key words: Schober test, lumbar flexion, inter-rater reliability, Backache, Pain, Tests and measurements. Intra-class correlation coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Iram Iqbal Shamsi
Articles by Basit Ansari
Articles by Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig
Articles by Sadaf Subhi
Articles by Noman Arshad Lari
on Google
on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Shamsi II, Ansari B, Baig AAM, Subhi S, Lari NA. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. RMJ. 2026; 51(3): 810-813.


Web Style

Shamsi II, Ansari B, Baig AAM, Subhi S, Lari NA. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=259114 [Access: August 19, 2026].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Shamsi II, Ansari B, Baig AAM, Subhi S, Lari NA. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. RMJ. 2026; 51(3): 810-813.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Shamsi II, Ansari B, Baig AAM, Subhi S, Lari NA. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. RMJ. (2026), [cited August 19, 2026]; 51(3): 810-813.



Harvard Style

Shamsi, I. I., Ansari, . B., Baig, . A. A. M., Subhi, . S. & Lari, . N. A. (2026) Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. RMJ, 51 (3), 810-813.



Turabian Style

Shamsi, Iram Iqbal, Basit Ansari, Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, Sadaf Subhi, and Noman Arshad Lari. 2026. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. Rawal Medical Journal, 51 (3), 810-813.



Chicago Style

Shamsi, Iram Iqbal, Basit Ansari, Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, Sadaf Subhi, and Noman Arshad Lari. "Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion." Rawal Medical Journal 51 (2026), 810-813.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Shamsi, Iram Iqbal, Basit Ansari, Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, Sadaf Subhi, and Noman Arshad Lari. "Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion." Rawal Medical Journal 51.3 (2026), 810-813. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Shamsi, I. I., Ansari, . B., Baig, . A. A. M., Subhi, . S. & Lari, . N. A. (2026) Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Schober for measuring lumbar flexion. Rawal Medical Journal, 51 (3), 810-813.