ISSN 0303-5212
 

Original Research 
RMJ. 2024; 49(2): 359-362


Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis

Amna Enam, Sadaf Zia, Iqbal A.M Khyani, Nida Khan, Iftikhar Arshad, Tariq Zia Siddiqui.


Abstract
Objective: To compare the frequency of post-operative complications after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with and without intranasal splint.
Methodology: This randomized control trial included 114 patients of both genders aged between 15-60 years undergoing FESS via non- probability sampling technique. Patients were randomly allocated into two treatment groups using lottery method. Patients in groups-A received splint while those in group-B did not receive. Outcome variable was frequency of post-operative adhesions, pain severity, discomfort, headache, infection, bleeding, and eye symptoms, which was noted and compared between the groups using chi-square test. SPSS-26 was used for data analysis.
Results: Significant difference was observed between Group-A and Group B in terms of post operative severity of pain, occurrence of adhesions, persistent defect and eye symptoms. However, no significant difference was observed in terms of occurrence of infection, bleeding, headache and discomfort.
Conclusion: Use of splints following FESS reduces post-operative adhesions and other problems like pain severity, headache, bleeding and infection.

Key words: Endoscopes, complications, bleeding, Splints.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Amna Enam
Articles by Sadaf Zia
Articles by Iqbal A.M Khyani
Articles by Nida Khan
Articles by Iftikhar Arshad
Articles by Tariq Zia Siddiqui
on Google
on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Enam A, Zia S, Khyani IA, Khan N, Arshad I, Siddiqui TZ. Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. RMJ. 2024; 49(2): 359-362.


Web Style

Enam A, Zia S, Khyani IA, Khan N, Arshad I, Siddiqui TZ. Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=143280 [Access: April 25, 2024].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Enam A, Zia S, Khyani IA, Khan N, Arshad I, Siddiqui TZ. Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. RMJ. 2024; 49(2): 359-362.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Enam A, Zia S, Khyani IA, Khan N, Arshad I, Siddiqui TZ. Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. RMJ. (2024), [cited April 25, 2024]; 49(2): 359-362.



Harvard Style

Enam, A., Zia, . S., Khyani, . I. A., Khan, . N., Arshad, . I. & Siddiqui, . T. Z. (2024) Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. RMJ, 49 (2), 359-362.



Turabian Style

Enam, Amna, Sadaf Zia, Iqbal A.M Khyani, Nida Khan, Iftikhar Arshad, and Tariq Zia Siddiqui. 2024. Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. Rawal Medical Journal, 49 (2), 359-362.



Chicago Style

Enam, Amna, Sadaf Zia, Iqbal A.M Khyani, Nida Khan, Iftikhar Arshad, and Tariq Zia Siddiqui. "Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis." Rawal Medical Journal 49 (2024), 359-362.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Enam, Amna, Sadaf Zia, Iqbal A.M Khyani, Nida Khan, Iftikhar Arshad, and Tariq Zia Siddiqui. "Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis." Rawal Medical Journal 49.2 (2024), 359-362. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Enam, A., Zia, . S., Khyani, . I. A., Khan, . N., Arshad, . I. & Siddiqui, . T. Z. (2024) Is splint really necessary in nasal surgeries? A prospective randomized analysis. Rawal Medical Journal, 49 (2), 359-362.